Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 01:53

Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
What’s next?
Trump administration’s deep cuts to public health leave system reeling - PBS
Let’s just make it real clear:
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Phase-resolved attoclock precisely measures electron tunneling time - Phys.org
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
How was your JEE Mains 2024 April attempt?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Can you name a female actress who has had bad timing or luck in her film career?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Aston Martin announce Stroll to miss Spanish Grand Prix - F1